Things become more complicated here, but one thing is certain:

"Why wall glamour are smart people wall glamour usually ugly? This rule is not without wall glamour exception, but the correlation seems to exist. While attractiveness is not an indicator of intelligence wall glamour (not all ugly people are intelligent), seems to be based on intelligence can predict how someone is attractive (smart people usually ugly).
Reader online magazines like Gawker has recently formulated a dilemma about the relationship between wall glamour intelligence and physical wall glamour beauty, He defeated in the contest for the "most interesting question will forever remain unanswered."
The concept of Gawker is such that serious pursuits for decision enigma was not. The thing is, however, the puzzles that psychologists do for nearly century, and what we have so far discovered, does not support the premise underlying the quoted question. The attractiveness and intelligence seems to have a positive correlation: attractive people are more intelligent, more intelligent people are more attractive. Is this a real connection or product bias our perception, a question to which there really is no clear answer. Are smart people ugly?
The idea that the physiognomy of the face reveals character dates back to Aristotle. The first pseudoscientific formulation, late 18th and early 19th century, gave her a German doctor wall glamour Gal (Franz Joseph Gall). His phrenology represented an attempt to get to the size of the skull, wall glamour protrusions and depressions on its surface, but also on the basis of the schedule of facial bones, draw conclusions about the mental capacity and personality traits. Proven unscientific, phrenology wall glamour is retired, but the search for an answer to the question whether behind the ugly face may hide a sophisticated mind continued.
Kudos to first deal with this issue in accordance with načunim method belongs to the American psychologist Rudolf Pintneru wall glamour (Rudolph Pintner). A researcher from Ohio showed a group of doctors, teachers, students and psychologists photos "nicely wall glamour dressed children." The task was that on the basis of the presented portraits of children ranked by intelligence. By crossing their evaluation with results that are portrayed children achieve in IQ, Pintner came to the conclusion that the relationship between intelligence and physical appearance exists, but that it was not strong enough to make the intellect could be predicted on the basis of physiognomy (abstract). A few years later, a similar experiment was granted by psychologists wall glamour led Anderson (Anderson LD) to the same conclusion: the correlation between facial features and intelligence there, but the look is not a reliable indicator of intellectual capacity.
After Pintnera and Anderson was scheduled a series of studies that dealt with the same problem. Respectively, the researchers inferred that the appearance of one's face still says something about his intelligence. Remained unanswered is the question of where the person is hiding information about intellectual abilities. Pintner, for example, noted that in some subjects in his study particularly strong impression left a smile on his face in the photograph. Some of them, however, on the ground that brought the assessment that this is a clever, others that this is a not-so-smart child.
Totally uninterested wall glamour in the question of the relation of intelligence and attractiveness, a possible answer to the riddle offered a psychologist at the University of Columbia in New York Edward Torndajk (Thorndike Edward). His theory of halo effect, was published in 1920, suggest about the following: When asked to describe the various features / quality individuals, entities will own assessment of certain traits tend to ascribe to the individual as a whole. If, for example, of respondents are looking to evaluate the person's physical appearance, intelligence wall glamour and tact in dealing with others, it is highly probable that they will all join the same characteristics of the evaluated value. Later research showed that photos can cause a halo effect: If someone looks attractive, people will consider it a smart, nice person, character, sociable ...
Things become more complicated here, but one thing is certain: "Mother Nature", despite the intuitive belief of the majority, do not take into account how to be fair in the distribution of traits. Moreover, it seems very biased and that the same birds who give generously bestows beauty and intellectual potential. The recent meta-analysis (pdf), written by Satoshi Kanazawa (Satoshi Kanazawa), a psychologist at the London School of Economics (LSE), ends with just such a conclusion: more appealing are intelligent.
Kanazawa based his study on two massive data sources: the National longitudinal study of adolescent health in the United States and the National Infant Development Studies in the UK. American study included a representative sample of 21,000 Americans born in 1980, while the British included all babies born in the UK during the week between the third and 9 March in 1958. year. Subjects from both studies were working standard IQ tests and specific mental abilities at different periods of his life. Interestingly, both studies have & #