The claim that the chairs are dangerous, it sounds absurd. They are ubiquitous, and it seems almost

Spending a longer period of time, together with the Industrial designer, you may notice vanity magazine a thing - they really are like crazy on the chairs. In fact, their taste is so predictable that we look only to the shirt they wear can often guess their favorite chair brand. Black shirt with a collar piepogājamu? Mies van der Rohe. Black bītlene? Peter Opsvik. Black top with a deep v-neckline combined with the abundant use of hair styling tool? Campanas brothers. Each design college graduate wants to his portfolio to be a stylish chair, and chair design there is fierce competition. Unless you have a sloth aizšķirstīt to the magazine "Wallpaper" end, you will definitely vanity magazine find a page that lists the vacancies for the post of famous designers: "Nepiesakieties to this post unless you have unusually vanity magazine awful infatuated with nice furniture creation of rich people." Do not want to damage the party, but the rest sucks. All. No designer has not led to a good chair, because it is simply not feasible. Some chairs are better than others, but all of them are bad. Chairs serious threat to our health, but over time they become inevitably linked vanity magazine to our individualism and social status obsessed culture. And what's the worst, we have become dependent on the chairs, and it is unknown whether we will ever get rid of them.
The claim that the chairs are dangerous, it sounds absurd. They are ubiquitous, and it seems almost too tedious to be harmful. However, if we consider that the average Briton spends sitting vanity magazine position fourteen hours a day - relying on the support of a chair, working, resting, contact the internet, eating and even sleeping - not hard to believe that the chairs can be quite a significant impact on our public health. As it turns out, they affect both the statistics and is relentless: last year, the American Cancer Society concluded a fourteen-year vanity magazine duration of the study, which was attended by 120,000 respondents and found that prolonged sitting during the day dramatically increases death threats. This trend has been observed even among those participants who regularly play sports, and although here again the causes are mixed with correlations, this study only complements the growing amount of evidence that shows that prolonged sitting contributes to heart disease, obesity, diabetes, depression and virtually countless orthopedic injuries. There is no significance to the fact that you are young, eat properly, and otherwise live an active life. The mere fact that excessively long in the sitting position, you will inevitably cause serious harm. However, in one sense, vanity magazine these results are misleading. They suggest that the problem lies in the fact that we are sitting on a lot. But the real problem is that our society sitting usually vanity magazine means placing the body on the high seat with special support for the back, it is - a chair. Sitting would not be so harmful, if we would not be sitting on the things that bad for us.
What makes the chairs vanity magazine so terrible? This is a complex issue because different chairs creates a different evil. Uncomfortable chairs usually has a negative pressure on certain parts of the body, or sitting on them excessive strain on the muscles. vanity magazine This can cause pain and provoke vanity magazine the occupant to sit down with a curved back, which makes it difficult for blood circulation, breathing, intestinal function and cause musculoskeletal injury risk. Comfortable chairs are even worse. Allowing long-term to maintain a posture and not move, they create a large, uniformly distributed load in the spine, weakens the muscles of the body support, which protects the body from injury, and rise to the same circulatory disorders as less comfortable counterparts. And this is just the beginning. There was a time when the idealistic furniture companies as "Hermann Miller" prophesied that will secure the chair design with uncertain science of ergonomics help. However, disputes and confusion dotted ergonomics literature does not provide answers. Nobody even knows what should be a good chair, let alone how to make. Some ergonomists argue that the spine should be allowed to play a C-shaped form, in order to prevent muscle tension, but this way is pressed vanity magazine internal organs, in addition to the time of such a posture of the spine disc hernia. Others believe that based waist, but the monstrous curve in the short term, not particularly better results in the long run - even more destructive: it weakens the muscles vanity magazine lumbar area, increasing the risk of injury to which these muscles are prevented. Similar disagreement is about the seat height, angle and depth; back, legs and armrests padding. Galena Krancis vanity magazine - architectural sociologist and, possibly, the world's leading researcher of the chair - named ergonomics as "contradictory and even stupid." Designers